INSIGHTS
Who Owns Music at Your Restaurant Group? Usually, Everyone and No One.
Vikas Sapra

I had a call recently with an eleven-location restaurant group, and I asked a simple question: who owns music across the portfolio?
The honest answer was basically everyone and no one. Marketing had set some loose vibe guidelines at some point. Operations wanted consistency across locations without necessarily driving what that consistency should sound like. GMs tweaked things locally when something felt off in their room. Staff filled in gaps on their own when the official system fell short. No single person in that chain was doing anything wrong — every one of those touchpoints was a reasonable response to a real, local problem. But no one owned the system as a whole, which meant the system as a whole wasn’t really being managed by anyone.
What “background music” quietly means in most organizations
That’s usually what “background music” ends up meaning in practice at multi-location operators, once you look closely: it runs, it exists, and it’s not governed by anyone with both the authority and the attention to manage it as a single, coherent thing. It’s nobody’s full-time job and everybody’s occasional problem, which is close to the worst possible ownership structure for anything that touches guest experience at every location, every hour the doors are open.
The reason this matters more than it might seem to on the surface is straightforward: if something is influencing pacing, dwell time, and energy across every location in your portfolio — which music demonstrably does — it isn’t background. Calling it “background” is a category error that’s led a lot of operators to under-invest in managing it relative to how much it’s actually doing. It’s infrastructure, in the same category as your POS system or your reservation platform: something that touches every location, every day, and quietly breaks down when nobody owns it end to end.
A question worth asking at your next ops meeting
If you run more than a couple of locations, it’s worth putting the same question to your own team that I put to that eleven-location group: who actually owns music across our portfolio? If the honest answer takes more than one sentence — if it’s “marketing sets guidelines and ops handles consistency and GMs adjust locally” — that’s a sign the ownership structure hasn’t caught up to how much the music is actually doing for (or against) your brand. The fix isn’t necessarily hiring someone full-time for it. It’s making sure the answer to “who owns this” is a name, not a committee.